The photo is a detail of the work done by the sculptor of Seville and professor at the University of Seville, Juan Manuel Miñarro, worked out by multidisciplinary group of scientists investigating the Shroud, making it the only Christ sindon the world, reflecting all the details of multiple injuries of the body reflected in the Shroud of Turin. "And all the people answered, His blood be on us
and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)
In these strange times in which we live, where the Pope, a German theologian, "expert theologian at the Second Vatican Council, the guardian against the will of the BMW plant in Munich during the II ° World War, wearing the uniform of the III rd Reich, totalitarianism pantheistic racist anti-Christian, heir turn of the Rod of Pedro of a playwright Polish, also partner against his will from Nazism in the plant of soda ash in Krakow, Poland, city of which would then Archbishop, both responsible for both the destruction of the contents of that Council, as the concealment of the murder of John Paul I, of the present apostasy of the Catholic Church, its policy of capitulation to international Zionism and its practices persecution and extermination of the indigenous Palestinian people in the Holy Land, never condemned by Rome.
I mean, in these strange days in which we live, where Joseph Ratzinger published a Life of Jesus of Nazareth, as if it were simply a writer, not the ultimate authority of the Church, confusing insiders and outsiders, given that the Pope's word is no small thing, even if not expressed ex cathedra, a work which places special emphasis on denying the responsibility of the Jewish people the Messiah's death and won the applause of Israeli Premier and the President of the World Jewish Council, which the Argentine Eduardo Elsztain, soy prinicipal landowner in the country, is its treasurer.
"Ratzinger shows an almost pathological concern for interpreting the New Testament in a friendly to the ears of the Jews. Even if it has even faced some gospel with others. According to Ratzinger, the story of San Juan is the most reliable with regard to ignition and the process and makes clear that the story of Matthew, to attributing guilt in Jesus Christ condemns the entire Jewish people, has no historical strength. Benedict XVI understands that according to John, Jesus is taken Pilate by the oligarchy of the Temple, ie by a minority of the Jewish people and that during the interrogation by the Roman procurator submits to Christ, not There are masses of Jews who describes vociferous Mateo. From all this follows that only a small part of the Jewish people took part in the process ended with the conviction of Jesus Christ. The texts of the Gospel of St. John, however, Ratzinger did not say what they want them to say. San Juan states: "Then Judas, arrived there with the cohort and the guards sent by the chief priests and Pharisees, with lanterns and torches and weapons." (John 18:3). At the time of Christ the Sadducees and Pharisees were, by far, the two main branches of Judaism and with one another, are undoubtedly the vast majority of Jews. Qumran sectarians were a group very minor, ascetic and isolated from the population and the Zealots were not more than the nationalist and violent sector of the town. So, who ordered the arrest of Jesus was not in any way unrepresentative minority, as is suggested Ratzinger "(Jorge Alvarez). Barabbas, redeemed by Christ before the frenzied mass acclaim, ultimately Pilate release Jesus, was a zealot terrorist, murderer confessed, something like the first Zionist history.
Times
where each one can doubt the truths of the faith of Christians, both in private and in public where attacks on the Church are applauded by the media, but cast doubt on the basis of serious and detailed scientific research, historical accuracy of the myth of the Holocaust that occurred during the "Second War, which killed 100 million Christians in Europe and Russia, involves the serious risk of persecution, imprisonment, isolation, poverty, physical violence, death itself.
In these strange days in which we live, where the Argentine Federal Judge testifies to the Armenian genocide, while others Argentine federal judge, along with the Supreme Court denied and conceal evidence during more than twenty years on the real perpetrators of the bombings of the Embassy of Israel and the AMIA, where representatives and senators vote Argentine budget for all Argentines make compensation by millions of families of the victims of such attacks, being, as has been the product of a fierce internal Zionism based in Tel Aviv after an attack on the Nation of Argentina, while veterans of the Falklands, many anonymous heroes, live on the margins and destitute, forgotten, silenced, manipulated, insulted, persecuted, imprisoned, which is why more than 300 of them, overwhelmed by poverty and despair, have taken their lives over the years.
In this day, Palm Sunday, the beginning of Holy Week of 2011 of the Christian era, I think it is an opportune time to publish this research paper, referring to the abduction , torture and murder of our Lord Jesus Christ.
The author of the research is an Argentine artillery colonel, Ph.D., of course, with fairly good accuracy.
the injustices that
CARRIED INIQUITY
(Jesus before the Sanhedrin in Jerusalem)
Colonel VALENTINE ANDRADE, Ph. D.
"I am surrounded by a herd of steers, bulls of Bashan cornered me, open their mouths against me like roaring lions and raptors. I like water spilled all my bones are dislocated, my heart has become like wax and melts within me, my throat is dry as a potsherd and my tongue sticks to the palate. I am surrounded by a pack of dogs, I am assailed by a gang, my hands drill and my feet and I sink into the dust of death. I can count all my bones: they look at me triumphantly, share my clothes together and lot for my clothes. (Psalm 22, 13-19)
God: Do I not hate those who hate you and hate those who despise you? I detest them relentlessly, and are to me real enemies. "(Psalm 139, 21-22)
was through a revelation as I got to know this mystery, as I have exposed in a nutshell. When you read them, they will realize that I have understanding of the mystery of Christ, which was not revealed to previous generations, but has now been revealed by the Spirit to his holy apostles and prophets. (Eph 3, 3-5)
THE PROLOGUE
Someone tried to do their own statistics and, taking the job of asking random people, but of the Catholic Faith, who was killed Jesus Christ, you will probably get at least a dozen replies loose, which could be classified by their frequency and class, turning in a diagram of poles that proudly show your friends or would serve to take the hair. Yes and of course, all would be given to foundations, some with substance and others exposed to vehemently defended. Many will say that the Romans killed Christ, a few Jews, while others ensure that Jews were the labor Roman than the Romans they were instigated by the Jews, some would ensure they were Roman soldiers who are noted for their cruelty, when in reality we know that the former, the detention orders were Jewish Sanhedrin, and second, the crucifixion, also Jews, but they served to Rome recruited in Jerusalem, some who was a political solution to the Praetor Pontius Pilate having its internal Rome after the cruel and unjust repression of the Samaritans, whatever his death is a basting mixture of all these joys and so on, not including wild.
How is it possible that one of the major events of the Passion of Christ has answers to many dissimilar twists and turns? These discussions and assumptions that are supported with emphasis would end in a heartbeat if we look within the Epistolary, the Pauline Letters. In his first letter St. Paul told the Thessalonians: "In effect, you brothers, followed the example of the Churches of God, united Christ Jesus who are in Judea, because they have suffered by their compatriots in the same way that they suffered from the Jews. They killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and persecute us, not pleasing to God and are enemies of all men, and preventing us from preaching to the Gentiles to be saved. So they are constantly filling up the measure of their sins, but God's wrath is upon them forever. "(1 Thess 2:14-16)
This is the word of a contemporary Jesus Christ, who describes himself as a Jewish fanatic (Phil 3, 4-5 and 1 Tim. 1.12), a Pharisee, Sanhedrin knowledgeable inside and out. The above letter, addressed to the first Christians of Thessalonica, a city in an entry in the Gulf of Thessaloniki in the Aegean Sea, they aware of the drama by oral tradition, would be enough to demolish any interested idealized version or is poured on trial that led to the gallows Salvador, in a simple device for the refinement of cruelty, which would from then until today, our emblem of redemption, as it is, at the same time of the martyrdom, injustice and iniquity never seen or counted.
But as there was no one suspicious, concerned that look intriguing or hair in the milk to give ground to the words of St. Paul, we say that there are other biblical passages that endorse the author's words, as quoted at the beginning of this article belongs to the Psalter (after Book Psalms), which was the Prayer Book of the Israelites, mostly attributed to King David, although it is known that it was written over several centuries and took part in various authors. The others are the Gospels of Matthew 26 and 27, San Marcos 14 and 15, John 18 and 19, who give their evidence being as they were two eyewitnesses to the proceedings, if the conviction and subsequent death.
But no doubt who narrates in detail the second session held in the morning of the 15th of Nissan (March), San Lucas in 22 and 23. There is more evidence as can be seen in Hech.13, 26-29, 16, 19-24, 17, 12-17, 23, 12-22, in the fourteen Pauline Letters, in the seven Catholic Epistles, etc.. More recently the Honourable Mr. JA Dupin, former prosecutor of the Supreme Court of France, published a pamphlet entitled Jesus Caiphas et devant Pilate (Jesus before Caiaphas and Pilate, Ed Garnot, Paris 1850), as a replica of the Jew Salvador, who had tried legitimize the trial and sentencing of Jesus in a treaty called Histoire des Institutions of Moïse et du peuple hébreu (History of the Mosaic institutions and the Jewish people, Volume I, I. IV, Cap. III, Trial and condemnation of Jesus.)
Dupin In the brief glow of light and science and their respect for Jesus Christ. Moreover, I think it is a profession of Christian faith before he died in the arms of the Archbishop of Paris, Monsignor Darboy. However, despite being light work of Dupin, the issue has not been exhausted. It is recognized, of course the hand of the prosecutor of the Supreme Court, who just a few outrageous enough to declare that such a court trial deserved undoubtedly appeal. Thirty years after this, two twin brothers, Augustine (1836-1909) and Joseph Lemann (1836-1915), Jews by birth and religion, who had converted to the Christian faith and embracing the priesthood later, picked up the theme initiated by Dupin and made a publication called Valeur de l'assemblée qui prnonça the comb mort contre Jésus-Christ (Value of the assembly who gave the death penalty against Jesus, 1881).
With very good sense to introduce these two priests in the texts of Dupin, the study of the individuals composing the Sanhedrin Jerusalem at that time and some of its history. Let's say of those 70 members of the Sanhedrin, they were able to locate about 35, which is something, because before we had nothing, at least as far as I'm concerned. The surprise was bigger when I come to find out the hand of these two brothers, who write "as children of Israel," which of these 35 characters located, 35 were bandits of the sabbath. I imagine what they must have been the remaining 35 if they sat in the living stones of masonry, side by side with these others, tolerated and made common cause with them.
this merit of twins Lemann, is the fact resuming the process against Jesus and analyze, step by step, from the standpoint of Jewish criminal law. Then quickly spring injustices systematically breaking the written law, and whose sum ends in iniquity we all know. In late October 2005, a nephew of mine I met these texts. When you browse them, simply, I realized they were not written to read, say, but to sit and study. And so it was with some old notes I served as references. Little had gone into this when I realized that Lemann brothers were they, surely unintentionally, some things in the pipeline. Was necessary that they were made manifest.
Thus was born the new record, Dupin horseback and two priests, and that should be called What they forgot the Lemann brothers. It is worth saying that the subject is not exhausted. Hardly. And I confess that I write really hoping that as it happened to me happen to another, and deepen further on how it was carried out this outrage.
THE MEETING OF THE NIGHT
To process devoted to Jesus, as I have said, two sessions of the Sanhedrin meeting. The first was held on the evening of 14 Nisan (March). The second was called for next morning. In this way then are assembled the Sanhedrin (Greek synédrion, which means meeting people seated), or as they called in those days, Grand Council (Concilium in the Vulgate) or Jewish Supreme Court (which is none other than Guerusía the Second Book of Maccabees). But this time they will meet secretly (like the scary picture painted by the heartbroken Ezekiel 8, 1-18), but publicly. We can see complete with 70 members representing the three corporations of the Jewish nation, the House of Priests (23 members), the House of Scribes and Doctors (also with 23 members), the House of Elders ( 23 members), and its President, Caiaphas, who had eight years was the High Priest. These numbers were released by the Zealot and then historian Flavius \u200b\u200bJosephus (Jewish War, II, XX, 5) or the New Moses Maimonides (Yad-Schazaka, Mano Poderosa) or Compendium of the Talmud, Book XIV (Constitutions Sanhedrin, Chap. I). To start saying that the arrest of Jesus we must note documentary: Those who had arrested Jesus took him to the house of the High Priest Caiaphas, where they had met the scribes and elders, Mat 26, 57 and reiterated in Mc. 14, 53-65, Luke. 22, 54-55, 63-71, Jn. 18, 24, 15-16.
FIRST INJUSTICE: A kidnapping that seems an arrest
Jewish law forbade night process: It may be a key issue during the day but should be suspended for the night (Mischna, treatise Sanhedrin, Chap. IV, No. 1). That It was night when they arrested Jesus tells John: And then, after receiving the morsel, Judas went out. It was evening, Jn. 13, 30. The authors of the kidnapping soldiers were Jews and not Romans as evidenced by the Hollywood film, also tells us the Apostle John: Then Judas, leading a detachment of soldiers, Jn. 18, 3, and that they obeyed orders of at least two-thirds of the council puts us then, and guards from the chief priests and Pharisees, came there with lanterns and torches and weapons. Lighted lanterns and torches to light is another proof that the abduction was carried out late at night, and in that are consistent with the other evangelists (Matt. 26, 30, 36, 47-56, Mk. 14, 26, 32, 43-52 and Luke. 22, 39, 47-53). It has not stopped my attention as weapons. Because a soldier is always manning their weapons. It's part of his uniform. The only name it, if it is of service as in this case involves that is armed. But here it is another thing. Intentionally weapons are mentioned, as if it were an addition to the usual supplies, or other more powerful weapons, outside of the envelope, but we do not know what they were. Why the Jews would take such equipment if the man accused of kidnapping was not anything, and neither he nor his followers had a history of dangerousness or to exercise any violence? Hence the question that made Christ (Lk 22, 52).
use the word synonymous with kidnapping and kidnapping and not stop, that is most used in this unfortunate episode, because having no formal accusation against Jesus and not mention the authority that ordered his arrest, unlawfully deprived him of freedom and leads him tied to a particular place, as they do to innocent people miscreants for ransom (which in this case was paying with their lives). The Jews surrounded the fact that certain formalities to look like an arrest in the eyes of the populace ignorant of yesterday and the indifference of today. Many have believed this in good faith, as perhaps happened to the Romans of the time, completely oblivious to these mishaps. But soon after analyzing it, dispassionately, we realize that it was a kidnapping. Legally this is true: in that distant past and in this present day.
SECOND INJUSTICE: Meeting after the evening sacrifice
While this was happening on the Mount of Olives in a particular property called Gethsemane, in the suburbs of Jerusalem, the Sanhedrin, with its 70 members distributed as I said, was meeting in the palace of Caiaphas (Luke 22, 54), contradicting the written law: Only the sacrifice will meet from morning until evening sacrifice (Jerusalem Talmud, treatise Sanhedrin, Chap.. I, p. 19).
THE THIRD INJUSTICE: They judge on the eve of a holiday
The date of abduction, as indicated above, it was the first day of unleavened bread, the day before the big party Easter: No judge or the day before the Sabbath, or day before a holiday (Mischna, treatise Sanhedrin, Chap. IV, No. 1).
FIRST
CAIAPHAS QUESTIONING BY JESUS \u200b\u200bTHE FOURTH
INJUSTICE: The prosecutor sits as judge
The high priest questioned Jesus, Jn. 18, 19 (also in Mt 26, 59-66; Mc.14, 55-64 and Luke. 22, 66-71). Who questions him is Caiaphas, who had stated earlier, in the general meeting of the council held at his palace when there was the resurrection of Lazarus (John 11, 43-44), that the public good imperatively demanded death Jesus of Nazareth (Jn. 11, 49-50). He said that, "says Juan-by itself, but as High Priest prophesied Jesus was to die for the nation (John 11, 51). From where I come to happen that was a very special prophecy: that Caiaphas would have to comply by using his power to instigate and then decide as if compelled to do so. Therefore there is a prophecy in the full sense of the term, but a threat then meets once a kidnapping and torture of premeditated murder.
How should understand this, if we see it, not only with today's eyes, but also with those of that yesterday? That the accuser has been allowed to sit as judge. And yet, as president of the debates. Perhaps the others could and left to allow unworthy thing or behaved and were his accomplices? Because all human laws, even the most remote times, denies the accused the right to sit as judge. If a false witness rises against a man accused of rebellion, the two parties to the dispute shall appear before the Lord, in the presence of the priests and judges in office, says in Deuteronomy 19, 16-17. As can be seen clearly, the accuser and the judge are different people and impossible to confuse.
But Caiaphas was confused with the elders and priests of Israel who are misled. They knew Caiaphas, the tribe of Annas, High Priest for eight years as I said, friend of the governor Pilate (F. Josephus, op. cit., XVIII, II, 2. Moreover, when it rose Pilate, Caiaphas the council rose strangely in the year 25 AD, when it fell Pilate strangely fell Caiaphas in the year 35 AD, so both covered their positions for eleven years) and knew what had gone a few days ago, preaching in the council and in the streets. That is a legal monstrosity. We recall in passing that Annas was the father of Caiaphas. Had been high priest for seven-year low Caponio governments, and Rufus Ambivio (from 7 to 11 AD), but no longer held the position it was consulting on all matters of utmost gravity. The papacy belonged to his family fifty years, without interruption, and five of his sons were coated with such dignity. The historian Josephus says that Annas was considered "the happiest man of his time." However, on the other hand, says that his spirit was haughty, bold and cruel "(Jewish Antiquities, XV, III, 1, XX , IX, 1, 2, War of the Jews, IV, v. 2, 6 and 7), all of which coincide with Lc.3, 2, Jn. 18, 13-24 and Acts. 4, 6.
As far as I'm concerned I have not an iota of doubt that Annas was consulted before, during and after the Jesus and would not be surprising that many of these evils, injustices and losses have been advised by his mouth "arrogant, bold and cruel" as described by his compatriot and near-contemporary, which exempts me Maybe to comment why the Apostle John puts the accent on this barbarity in a repeated phrase of the Passion that is almost to the wise: It was Caiaphas who had advised the Jews: It is better that one man die for the people (John 18:14). But, I ask a moment: do this can go beyond Caiaphas? That is to say, was one of the Sanhedrin Caiaphas was disqualified to sit as a judge? I think not: Since that day, the general meeting of the Sanhedrin after the resurrection of Lazarus, "to be resolved to kill Jesus (John 11, 53). And who decided this? Well, all of the Sanhedrin. So that all the 69 national corporations Judaism more Caiaphas the High Priest, sitting in their armchairs them ashlar stone, rather than judges were murderers conspirators to commit a premeditated crime and as such, they knew what should be the end of the one who had his front foot and tied like a lamb (John 18, 12).
INJUSTICE: It examines the quality of the witnesses
the chief priests and the whole council sought false testimony against Jesus to put him to death, but did not find, despite have given many false witnesses (Mt. 26, 59-60 and Mc. 14, 55-56). As Jesus had appealed to the presence of witnesses and those who were numerous statements were incredible given it incurred in continuing contradictions (Mk 14, 56 and 59) could not be an indictment or sentencing, what would the Sanhedrin to the need of a witness that would allow a sentence? As the guards sent Jews to find witnesses among the street trash and even came to order the bribes to ensure the result. Think about the reader what the guards could find Jews in Jerusalem this morning of two thousand years ago. The same is now located on roads of any city gadabout bats, pumpkins and vague nomadic living hand to mouth, people at night and inn. Well, these are the people from which the Sanhedrin would bring his witnesses to splash on the face of Christ. But this, it enters the gallery of terror, not so much as that this procedure violates the law given by God to the Jews through Moses: The judge investigated the case carefully, and if it becomes apparent that the accuser is a false witness and has testified falsely against his brother, will make him just as he had planned to do against his brother. Thus shall you purge the evil from among you (Deut. 19, 18).
THE SIXTH INJUSTICE: No witnesses swore
fundamental law required judges to administer oaths to witnesses before the start of his deposition, forcing them to tell the truth and nothing but the truth: He thinks a great deal of responsibility hanging over you (Mischna, treatise Sanhedrin, Chap. IV, No. 5). But in the process of Jesus there was no such protocol or met the wise precepts. These judges under the leadership of a malignant evil that bribed witnesses to tell lies, hung themselves, for that matter, under the weight of the law prescribing: Do not have pity: life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot (Deut. 19, 21).
THE SEVENTH INJUSTICE: Judges do violate and violating the
This irregular proceeding with witnesses, calls the outrage Deuteronomy (Deut. 19, 20), forced the breach of standard as to prescribe corrective, not only for judges but also for others who were under his jurisdiction and had been instigated by aberrant behavior to commit atrocities. Is that long before these events, members of these corporations had ceased to be judges or, in this case, they never were. They were a bunch of murderous conspirators to smear, torture and shedding the blood of a fair.
0 comments:
Post a Comment